POSS Vitrimers: The Cage as a Dynamic Si–O–Si Node

Epoxy nanocomposite vitrimers containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) were reported by Hongkun Yang, Changfei He, Thomas P. Russell, and Dong Wang in Giant in 2020. Studies devoted specifically to POSS in vitrimer networks remain scarce, and this one still carries the subject almost on its own. Glycidyl POSS was incorporated as a nanoscale filler into a transesterification-based epoxy, raising tensile strength and strain at break simultaneously while shifting the topology-freezing transition upward by more than 36 °C. A handful of related reports place silsesquioxane particles in other dynamic matrices, among them the bio-based polymethacrylate vitrimer nanocomposites of Hajiali, Tajbakhsh, and Marić, and in every case the cage serves as reinforcing filler.

Key findings at a glance
  • 10 wt% glycidyl POSS raises the ultimate tensile strength of a transesterification epoxy vitrimer from 21.9 to 35.8 MPa (+63.5%) and the strain at break from 190 to 334% (+75.8%).
  • The topology-freezing temperature Tv climbs from 49.1 to 85.5 °C and the activation energy for exchange from 82.3 to 107.9 kJ mol⁻¹, so creep resistance is decoupled from processability.
  • TBD-catalyzed Si–O–Si siloxane exchange is the fastest dynamic Si–O chemistry reported, with τ* = 5.6 s at 220 °C.
  • Direct silyl ether metathesis trades speed for stability: 5% mass loss only at 427 °C.
  • Open question: the twelve Si–O–Si bridges of the T8 cage have never been tested as the exchange site itself, only as a passive junction.

Over the same period the silicon–oxygen bond has become one of the most productive dynamic covalent motifs in vitrimer design, through TBD-catalyzed siloxane exchange from the Du Prez group and through direct silyl ether metathesis discovered in the Guan laboratory. The two routes act on different bonds, Si–O–Si in the first case and Si–O–C in the second. The T8 silsesquioxane cage is built from twelve Si–O–Si bridges, structurally the same linkage that the Du Prez system exchanges in under six seconds, yet the question of whether those bridges can act as the dynamic site, rather than as inert structural scaffolding, appears not to have been put. What follows sets out what is established across five studies and identifies the control experiment that would settle the question.

Associative vs Dissociative Covalent Adaptable Networks: What Defines a Vitrimer

Covalent adaptable networks divide into two families, and the distinction governs everything that follows. In a dissociative mechanism the crosslink breaks before a new bond forms, so the crosslink density falls transiently, the viscosity drops sharply, and at sufficiently high temperature the network can depolymerize outright. The reversible Diels–Alder reaction is the canonical example. In an associative mechanism the incoming partner binds before the original bond is cleaved, so the number of crosslinks remains constant across the entire temperature range. The material rearranges its topology without ever losing network integrity, and it was this class that Ludwik Leibler named vitrimers in 2011, in the work by Damien Montarnal and co-workers that established silica-like malleability in a permanent organic network.

POSS vitrimer mechanisms: dissociative versus associative covalent adaptable network exchange
Fig. 1. Two families of covalent adaptable networks. In the dissociative mechanism (a) the crosslink is cleaved first, which lowers the crosslink density transiently and, in the limit, costs the network its integrity. In the associative mechanism (b) the exchange partner adds before the original bond breaks, by way of the transition state marked with a dotted circle, so the number of junctions stays constant. Vitrimers belong exclusively to the second group. Redrawn from: Denissen, W.; Winne, J. M.; Du Prez, F. E. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 30. DOI: 10.1039/C5SC02223A, Fig. 1.

Arrhenius Flow and the Topology-Freezing Transition (Tv) of Vitrimers

The rheological consequence of associative exchange is best seen on an Angell fragility plot. Thermoplastics possess a narrow glass transition across which the viscosity collapses by orders of magnitude within a few tens of degrees, which in practice means a narrow processing window and a requirement for close temperature control. Vitrimers behave differently: their viscosity follows an Arrhenius law over a very wide temperature range, in the manner of silica rather than polystyrene. In rheological terminology they are strong liquids, and the practical consequence is a material that can be shaped with the tolerance of a silicate glass rather than the precision demanded by a thermoplastic melt.

Angell fragility plot comparing epoxy-POSS vitrimers with silica and thermoplastics, Arrhenius flow
Fig. 2. Angell fragility plot. Thermoplastics (PS, PVC) show the steep, almost vertical viscosity collapse characteristic of fragile liquids. The epoxy–POSS vitrimers fall along a straight line, as silica does, indicating Arrhenius flow and a broad processing window. Their fragility indices are 13 for the unfilled network and 16 at 10 wt% POSS, both below the value of roughly 20 for SiO₂. Vitrimer points were calculated from the Ea and Tv values in Yang, H.; He, C.; Russell, T. P.; Wang, D. Giant 2020, 4, 100035, Table 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2020.100035; reference curves were generated with the MYEGA model of Mauro, J. C.; Yue, Y.; Ellison, A. J.; Gupta, P. K.; Allan, D. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 19780. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911705106.

The temperature at which the viscosity passes 10¹² Pa·s defines the topology-freezing transition, Tv. Above it the network is a viscoelastic liquid with a fixed junction count; below it the material is an elastomer or a glass. Together with Tg this provides two independent handles on the mechanical response, and much of the interest in filled vitrimers comes from the possibility of moving one without moving the other.

Synthesis of Functionalized POSS Cages: Condensation, Corner Capping, Hydrosilylation

Any discussion of POSS in dynamic networks has to begin with how the cages are made, because the available substitution patterns determine what network architectures are reachable. The cubic T8 framework, Si₈O₁₂R₈, forms by hydrolytic condensation of a trifunctional silane RSiX₃ where X is chloride or alkoxide. The reaction is run in dilute solution, often for days, and for many R groups the closed cubic cage is the thermodynamic sink, so the process is self-correcting if given enough time. Yields are strongly substituent-dependent, and the same conditions that deliver a clean octamer for one R group can give a mixture of T8, T10, and T12 cages for another. Octa(3-aminopropyl)silsesquioxane, the building block behind much of the functional POSS work from the University of Wrocław, is obtained this way from 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and then elaborated by amide coupling at the eight peripheral amines.

Two further routes matter for network chemistry. Corner capping starts from an incompletely condensed trisilanol, R₇Si₇O₉(OH)₃, and closes the eighth vertex with a different RSiCl₃, which gives a cage bearing seven of one substituent and one of another. This is the standard way to make a monofunctional POSS for pendant attachment. Platinum-catalyzed hydrosilylation of octahydridosilsesquioxane, Si₈O₁₂H₈, with a terminal alkene gives octa-substituted cages directly and tolerates a wide range of functionality, which is how the glycidyl cages used in vitrimer work are most conveniently accessed. Octaglycidyl cages are most reliably prepared by hydrosilylation of Si₈O₁₂H₈ with allyl glycidyl ether, since the direct hydrolytic condensation of (3-glycidoxypropyl)trimethoxysilane is complicated by the sensitivity of the oxirane ring to the acid or base used to promote condensation. Commercial glycidyl POSS is supplied in some grades as a cage mixture rather than a pure octamer, so the stoichiometry is worth checking in any given batch. Yang and co-workers used material from Hybrid Plastics and report a molar mass of 1337.88 g/mol with an epoxy equivalent weight of 167. Those values match the calculated mass of Si₈O₁₂(C₆H₁₁O₂)₈ at 1337.9 g/mol and one eighth of it at 167.2, so their material corresponds to full octa-substitution of a T8 cage.

The same Karstedt hydrosilylation chemistry appears again in the silicone vitrimer discussed later in this post, where allyl glycidyl ether is added across the two Si–H bonds of 1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane to give a difunctional siloxane epoxide. What matters for the argument developed here is that none of this requires new synthetic methodology. Every cage and every linker involved is either commercial or accessible in one step from commercial material, which means the experiment proposed at the end of this post can be attempted immediately.

Epoxy–POSS Nanocomposite Vitrimers by Hydroxyl–Ester Transesterification

The only dedicated POSS vitrimer study uses a formulation assembled entirely from catalogue reagents. Yang and co-workers combined diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DER 332), dodecanedioic acid as the hardener, and glycidyl POSS, with 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene at 2.5 mol% relative to carboxyl groups as the transesterification catalyst. The components were heated to 160 °C with stirring, the catalyst was added, and the homogeneous melt was poured into preheated PTFE molds and cured for six hours at 160 °C. POSS was introduced at 2, 5, 8, and 10 wt%, with the DGEBA fraction adjusted each time to hold the epoxy to carboxyl stoichiometry at unity. The low viscosity of glycidyl POSS and its miscibility with DGEBA make this a genuinely homogeneous system rather than a dispersion, which matters because aggregation is the usual failure mode for silica-type fillers in epoxy networks.

The exchange chemistry is hydroxyl–ester transesterification. Secondary hydroxyl groups generated by epoxide ring opening attack ester linkages elsewhere in the network, transferring a junction without changing the total number of junctions. Infrared spectroscopy confirmed essentially complete conversion: the epoxide bands of DGEBA at 915 cm⁻¹ and of POSS at 909 and 1199 cm⁻¹ disappeared, while the ester carbonyl appeared at 1737 cm⁻¹. Swelling in chlorobenzene for 72 hours left every sample insoluble, with gel fractions rising from 97.12% for the unfilled network to 98.06% at 10 wt% POSS and crosslink densities increasing from 7.04 to 10.6 × 10⁻⁴ mol cm⁻³.

Synthesis scheme of epoxy-POSS nanocomposite vitrimer from DGEBA, dodecanedioic acid and octaglycidyl POSS cage with TBD catalyst
Fig. 3. Construction of the epoxy–POSS nanocomposite vitrimer. The upper panel shows the three components: DGEBA (blue), dodecanedioic acid (green), and the octafunctional glycidyl POSS cage, cured with TBD at 2.5 mol% relative to carboxyl groups. The lower panel shows the resulting network, in which the T8 cage serves as an eight-arm junction and the orange markers indicate ester linkages formed on epoxide ring opening. The two insets show both states of the exchange: an ester bond with its neighbouring free hydroxyl, and the product after transesterification. That hydroxyl group is what carries the network dynamics. Redrawn from: Yang, H.; He, C.; Russell, T. P.; Wang, D. Giant 2020, 4, 100035. DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2020.100035, Scheme 1.

The mechanical results are unusual in that two properties normally traded against one another both improve. At 10 wt% POSS the ultimate tensile strength rises from 21.9 ± 0.5 to 35.8 ± 0.5 MPa, an increase of 63.5%, while the strain at break rises from 190 ± 15% to 334 ± 20%, an increase of 75.8%. Reinforcement almost always costs ductility, so simultaneous gains call for an explanation, and the authors attribute it to two distinct roles played by the cage. The eight glycidyl arms raise the crosslink density, which accounts for the strength, while the molecularly dispersed, nanoporous cage absorbs deformation energy, which accounts for the toughness.

Tensile strength and strain at break of epoxy-POSS vitrimer versus POSS loading in wt%
Fig. 4. Strength and ductility increase together. Ultimate tensile strength and strain at break plotted against POSS loading. Both rise monotonically, which is atypical of filled systems, where reinforcement is normally paid for in ductility. Data from Yang, H.; He, C.; Russell, T. P.; Wang, D. Giant 2020, 4, 100035, Table 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2020.100035.

Two properties move in the opposite direction. The Young's modulus falls from 799 ± 11 to 632 ± 23 MPa, and the glass transition temperature decreases from 34.8 to 27.1 °C by DMA and from 27.1 to 25.2 °C by DSC, with the 8 wt% sample departing from the trend in the DMA series and the 10 wt% sample departing from it in the DSC series. A decrease in Tg alongside an increase in crosslink density looks contradictory, and it is one of the more interesting details in the paper. The branched glycidyl POSS modifies the network topology and introduces a side-chain effect that outweighs the stiffening contributed by the additional junctions, an outcome previously documented for monofunctional POSS in epoxy networks by Abad and co-workers.

POSS Vitrimer Relaxation Kinetics: Decoupling Creep Resistance from Processability

The title of the Yang paper promises efficient relaxation, and the data say something more subtle. Stress relaxation at 160 °C slows from 7.4 minutes in the unfilled vitrimer to 27.0 minutes at 10 wt% POSS, a factor of 3.6. The activation energy for exchange rises from 82.26 ± 2.05 to 107.90 ± 3.48 kJ mol⁻¹, and the topology-freezing temperature climbs from 49.1 to 85.5 °C. Every one of these numbers points the same way: POSS slows the network dynamics.

Read as a deficiency this would be a poor result, but that reading misses what the numbers describe. The network still relaxes completely at 1% strain, so it remains fully reprocessable, and the authors demonstrate this by cutting a specimen into pieces and remolding it with no loss of ultimate tensile strength across cycles. What changes is the temperature at which flow begins. A higher Tv means better creep resistance at service temperature, and a rubbery modulus at 150 °C that doubles from 1.77 to 3.75 MPa means better dimensional stability. The cage therefore separates two properties that are coupled in a conventional vitrimer: strength at the temperature of use and flow at the temperature of processing. That is precisely the function expected of a well-designed network junction.

Relaxation time, activation energy and topology-freezing temperature Tv of epoxy-POSS vitrimers versus POSS content
Fig. 5. Three independent measures of network dynamics agree. Relaxation time at 160 °C (7.4 to 27.0 min), activation energy for exchange (82.3 to 107.9 kJ mol⁻¹), and topology-freezing temperature (49.1 to 85.5 °C) all rise together on going from 0 to 10 wt% POSS. The network still relaxes completely; what changes is the rate, not the capacity. Data from Yang, H.; He, C.; Russell, T. P.; Wang, D. Giant 2020, 4, 100035, Table 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2020.100035.

TBD-Catalyzed Siloxane Exchange in Vitrimers and the Role of the N–H Proton

While POSS has barely entered vitrimer chemistry, the silicon–oxygen bond has entered it along two independent routes. The first was opened by Peng Zheng and Thomas McCarthy in 2012, who showed that siloxane equilibration provides a simple and robust self-healing mechanism in polysiloxanes. The limitation of that chemistry was speed: every material built on it relaxed over at least several hundred seconds, which places it outside any realistic industrial processing window.

The breakthrough came from the Du Prez group at Ghent University. Tapas Debsharma and co-workers reported in JACS in 2022 a siloxane exchange pathway catalyzed by TBD in the presence of hydroxyl groups, mechanistically a proton shuttling process analogous to the TBD-catalyzed polymerization of cyclic siloxanes described by Fuchise, Shimada, and co-workers. They established the pathway with a model study in which 1,3-divinyltetramethyldisiloxane and 1,3-bis(3-aminopropyl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane were heated together at 120 °C for 16 hours under four sets of conditions. Silicon-29 NMR showed new resonances at 4.1 and 8.4 ppm, adjacent to the starting materials at 7.5 and 3.2 ppm, when both TBD and pentanol were present. Neither alcohol alone nor a metathesis-type pathway produced any exchange. TBD without added pentanol gave the same resonances only faintly, which the authors attribute to residual moisture or to silanol groups on the glass of the reaction vial, and which supports rather than weakens the role assigned to the hydroxyl.

The mechanistic evidence rests not on a single control but on a screen of seven catalysts, and that is the most persuasive part of the work. The ionic bases all function, though not by a single route: tert-butoxide most likely deprotonates the secondary alcohol formed in the epoxy-amine reaction and starts the exchange as an alkoxide rather than as a siloxide, while trimethylsilanolate and tetramethylammonium siloxanolate supply siloxide directly. Loadings differ too, since tert-butoxide is inactive at 3 mol% and works at 6, and tetramethylammonium siloxanolate decomposes above 150 °C and has to be processed at 180 °C rather than 220 °C. Among the neutral organic bases only TBD works; MeTBD, DBU, and DMAP give no measurable exchange after an hour at 220 °C. The decisive comparison is the first pair. TBD and MeTBD have nearly identical basicity and differ only in that the N–H group of MeTBD is capped with a methyl, yet capping that single proton switches the catalysis off completely. The failure of DBU and DMAP shows in addition that strong amidine or pyridine basicity is not on its own sufficient. Taken together, the screen indicates that the N–H proton participates directly in the catalytic cycle rather than acting only through basicity.

Catalytic cycle of TBD-catalyzed Si-O-Si siloxane exchange with hydroxyl group in a vitrimer network
Fig. 6a. Proposed pathway for TBD-catalyzed siloxane exchange in the presence of hydroxyl groups. TBD acts as a proton shuttle, with the N–H group participating directly in the cycle. The lack of catalytic activity shown by MeTBD, which has comparable basicity, supports this assignment. Redrawn from: Debsharma, T.; Amfilochiou, V.; Wróblewska, A. A.; De Baere, I.; Van Paepegem, W.; Du Prez, F. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12280. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03518, Scheme 2.
Catalyst screen for siloxane exchange: TBD, MeTBD, DBU, DMAP, tBuOK, SiMe3OK, TMAS
Fig. 6b. The catalyst screen. The ionic bases tBuOK, SiMe₃OK, and TMAS all promote exchange by generating siloxide. Among the neutral organic bases only TBD is active; MeTBD, DBU, and DMAP give no measurable exchange. The comparison between TBD and MeTBD is decisive, since the two differ only by a methyl group on nitrogen and have essentially the same basicity. Redrawn from: Debsharma, T.; Amfilochiou, V.; Wróblewska, A. A.; De Baere, I.; Van Paepegem, W.; Du Prez, F. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12280. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03518, Scheme 3.

The resulting material is prepared by curing DGEBA with the siloxane diamine at 120 °C in the presence of 10 mol% TBD relative to the Si–O–Si units. Its characteristic relaxation time is 5.6 s at 220 °C, the fastest siloxane exchange reported, with an activation energy of 87.2 ± 0.9 kJ mol⁻¹ and a glass transition temperature near 85 °C. Thermogravimetry places 5% mass loss at 350 °C, and an isothermal hold at 220 °C for one hour costs about 1% of the mass. The network was mechanically reprocessed three times, recovering a relaxation time of roughly 6 s, a DSC Tg of 85 °C, and a soluble fraction near 1% on each occasion.

The practical significance lies in the viscosity. The formulation measures 300 mPa·s at 25 °C, lower than commercial epoxy resins of comparable Tg, and it stays low for more than an hour of mixing. That allowed the authors to impregnate eight plies of plain-woven glass fabric at 220 g m⁻² by vacuum-assisted resin infusion, the technique used to manufacture wind turbine blades, and then to thermoform the cured laminate at 190 °C under 30 bar. A cured glass-fibre composite that can be reshaped after manufacture is a genuinely new object.

Direct Silyl Ether Metathesis: Vitrimers Without Free Hydroxyl Groups

The second route to dynamic Si–O chemistry comes from Zhibin Guan's laboratory at UC Irvine, where Chase Tretbar, James Neal, and Guan reported the first example of direct silyl ether metathesis in JACS in 2019. The advance over earlier silyl ether systems is the removal of free hydroxyl groups from the network. Previous designs required a free alcohol as the exchange partner, and at elevated temperature alcohols open the door to dehydration, oxidation, and transesterification with acrylate backbones. Ether to ether metathesis avoids the problem entirely.

The reaction was established on small molecules by mixing ethyltributoxysilane and ethyltripentoxysilane in anhydrous solvent and following the approach to the statistical 1:3:3:1 distribution of the four possible silanes by GC-MS. Without catalyst, full equilibration required 16.5 hours at 190 °C. Camphorsulfonic acid at 5 mol% proved the most effective of the catalysts tested, which also included zinc and scandium triflates. The polymer was then built from commodity material: poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) with 6 mol% vinyl acetate was hydrolyzed quantitatively with sodium methoxide and the resulting alcohols were silylated with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide to give a trimethylsilyl ether functional polyethylene. Crosslinking used bis(methoxydimethyl)silyl octane, itself made in one step from the corresponding bis(chlorodimethyl)silyl octane and methanol, at 3 mol% of the available OTMS groups with 2 mol% camphorsulfonic acid, and gelation occurred in toluene at 80 °C.

Silyl ether-hydroxyl exchange versus direct silyl ether metathesis in Si-O vitrimers
Fig. 7. Two strategies for silyl ether dynamics. (A) Silyl ether–hydroxyl exchange requires a free alcohol as the partner, and at elevated temperature that alcohol opens pathways to dehydration, oxidation, and transesterification. (B) Direct metathesis proceeds between two silyl ethers with no free alcohol involved, so the network loses its most reactive component while the Si–OR motif remains thermally and oxidatively robust. This difference is what yields a vitrimer whose 5% mass loss occurs only at 427 °C. Redrawn from: Tretbar, C. A.; Neal, J. A.; Guan, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16595. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b08876, Fig. 1.

With a Si–O bond dissociation energy near 535 kJ mol⁻¹ and no reactive hydroxyls present, the resulting vitrimer loses 5% of its mass only at 427 °C, which the authors identify as the highest value reported for a vitrimer at the time of publication in 2019. The activation energy for exchange is 77.8 kJ mol⁻¹, the topology-freezing temperature is 45 °C, and crosslinking raises the Young's modulus fivefold from 19.2 ± 1 to 101 ± 19 MPa. The cost of that stability appears in the kinetics: relaxation times run from 6456 s at 130 °C to 770 s at 170 °C.

Comparing Si–O Exchange Kinetics: Siloxane, Silyl Ether and Ester Vitrimers

Placing the three systems on common axes, with the unfilled epoxy network as a baseline, makes the trade-off explicit. Each line below is an Arrhenius extrapolation anchored at a single published point using the reported activation energy, so the comparison rests on measured values rather than on digitized curves.

Arrhenius comparison of relaxation times for siloxane exchange, silyl ether metathesis and transesterification vitrimers
Fig. 8. The landscape of dynamic Si–O exchange in vitrimers. TBD-catalyzed siloxane exchange (τ* = 5.6 s at 220 °C) is more than two orders of magnitude faster than silyl ether metathesis (τ* = 770 s at 170 °C), which in turn offers unmatched thermal stability (Td,5% = 427 °C). Transesterification in the epoxy–POSS network is the slowest of the three up to roughly 175 °C, crossing below silyl ether metathesis only above that temperature. The fourth line is the unfilled epoxy vitrimer from the same study, shown as a baseline for what the cage changes. Markers are published values; lines are Arrhenius extrapolations from the reported activation energies. Compiled from three studies: Debsharma, T. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12280. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03518; Tretbar, C. A.; Neal, J. A.; Guan, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16595. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b08876; Yang, H. et al. Giant 2020, 4, 100035. DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2020.100035.

Only the TBD-catalyzed siloxane system enters the window below 60 s where industrial compression molding becomes practical. Silyl ether metathesis buys thermal stability at the price of roughly three orders of magnitude in rate, and the epoxy–POSS transesterification network, with the highest activation energy of the three at 107.9 kJ mol⁻¹, is the most temperature-sensitive and therefore the one whose processing window is most sharply defined.

Octaglycidyl POSS in a Disulfide-Exchange Silicone Vitrimer

One study has already brought the two worlds together, although it was not framed that way. Cheng'e Yue and co-workers at Harbin University of Science and Technology published a vitrimeric silicone composite for thermal interface applications in the Journal of Colloid and Interface Science in 2022. The matrix is a siloxane epoxide, prepared by Karstedt-catalyzed hydrosilylation of allyl glycidyl ether with 1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane, cured with 4-aminophenyl disulfide so that aromatic disulfide metathesis supplies the dynamic chemistry. The filler is boron nitride nanosheets, exfoliated by sonication, hydroxylated, and surface-modified with (3-glycidoxypropyl)trimethoxysilane to improve compatibility with the matrix. The third component is octaglycidyl POSS, the same cage and the same supplier as in the Yang study, blended at a DGESi:APDS:POSS weight ratio of 100:60:x and cured at 150 °C for two hours in air.


Synthesis of disulfide-exchange silicone vitrimer from DGESi, 4-aminophenyl disulfide and octaglycidyl POSS
Fig. 9. Construction of the vitrimeric silicone composite. Hydrosilylation of 1,1,3,3-tetramethyldisiloxane with allyl glycidyl ether over Karstedt’s catalyst gives the difunctional siloxane epoxide DGESi, which is then cured with 4-aminophenyl disulfide in the presence of octaglycidyl POSS. In the resulting network the POSS cage acts as a junction while the aromatic disulfide bridges carry the dynamics, and it is their exchange that provides self-healing and reprocessability. Redrawn from: Yue, C.; Zhao, L.; Guan, L.; Zhang, X.; Qu, C.; Wang, D.; Weng, L. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 620, 273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.017, Fig. 1a.

At 10 wt% POSS the tensile strength increases 2.82-fold to 8.4 ± 0.1 MPa. The thermally conductive composites were built on the POSS-5 matrix rather than POSS-10, and with 66 wt% functionalized boron nitride their thermal conductivity reaches 1.41 ± 0.05 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹, more than six times that of the unfilled elastomer, and the healing efficiency remains at 92.0 ± 1.5% against 98.8 ± 1.1% for the unfilled matrix. Thermal conductivity recovers to 99.3% of its original value after six healing cycles.

The detail most easily missed concerns the glass transition. In this work POSS raises Tg from 45.4 ± 0.2 to 51.1 ± 0.4 °C, whereas in the Yang study it lowered Tg. The same cage, from the same supplier, produces opposite effects in two different matrices, because the network topology and the mode of incorporation differ. That single observation is a compact statement of how much remains unexamined.

Can the T8 Cage Backbone Itself Be the Exchange Site?

The established facts can be summarized briefly. The silicon–oxygen bond is thermodynamically strong at roughly 535 kJ mol⁻¹ and kinetically labile under the right conditions, a combination that makes it an excellent dynamic motif. It can be exchanged quickly, in 5.6 s with TBD and a hydroxyl partner, or exchanged with exceptional stability, surviving to 427 °C through silyl ether metathesis. The T8 cage incorporated as a filler into a vitrimer network raises strength and ductility simultaneously, increases Tv, and decouples creep resistance from processability.

What has not been examined is what happens when the cage stops being a filler and becomes the carrier of the dynamic chemistry. In all three network studies the cage is an additive. It sits in the network, it raises the crosslink density, and it modifies the mechanical response, but the exchange happens somewhere else: on the ester bonds of the matrix, on the disulfide bridges, on the siloxane units of the hardener. The cage is a passive junction in a dynamic network.

It is worth separating three levels at which a cage can participate. At the first level the cage is a nanoscale filler and the exchange happens entirely in the surrounding matrix, which is what every study described above actually demonstrates. At the second level the cage becomes a multifunctional covalent junction whose vertices carry the dynamic groups, and this has been explored in part, since the glycidyl arms in the Yang network do sit adjacent to the exchanging esters. The third level has not been reached at all, and it is the one where the Si–O–Si bridges of the cage framework themselves take part in associative exchange.

That third level is not an exotic proposal. The T8 cage is built from twelve Si–O–Si bridges, structurally the same linkage that Du Prez and co-workers exchange in 5.6 s. The question it raises, and one that appears not to have been put, is whether a silsesquioxane cage in the presence of TBD and hydroxyl groups becomes a dynamic junction in its own right, so that the cage framework rather than its substituents carries the topology rearrangement.

A positive result is not guaranteed, and the structural arguments cut both ways. The Si–O–Si angles in the cubic cage are strained relative to linear siloxanes, which could make the bridges more susceptible to nucleophilic attack and therefore faster to exchange. The same strain, however, means that an opened cage has no straightforward route back to the closed structure, so exchange could lead to irreversible cage opening and condensation into ladder or resinous architectures rather than to clean associative exchange. The cage might also simply be unreactive on the timescale of the experiment, since the bridging oxygens are sterically shielded by eight substituents pointing outward from the vertices.

A Silicon-29 NMR Control Experiment to Test POSS Cage Exchange

The first question to settle is narrow and cheap to answer. Octaglycidyl POSS, or any soluble T8 cage, is held at 220 °C in the presence of 10 mol% TBD and a hydroxyl source under the conditions that produce fast siloxane exchange in the Du Prez system, and the cage is monitored by silicon-29 NMR. Every silicon in a closed T8 cage carries three siloxane bridges, so the cage is a T³ species and gives a single symmetric resonance; the Wrocław group reports −66.2 ppm for their octa-functionalized cages, and values between roughly −66 and −70 ppm are typical for alkyl-substituted cages. Survival of the cage would show that one resonance persisting throughout. Opening a bridge converts two silicons from T³ to T², and those T² signals appear well downfield of the cage, in the region around −56 to −60 ppm. Cage opening would therefore announce itself as new T² intensity, loss of the symmetry that makes all eight silicon atoms equivalent, and in the limit a broad envelope characteristic of a condensed resin.

Either outcome is informative. If the cage survives, the next experiment is a crossover study with two differently substituted cages, following the design Debsharma and co-workers used for their disiloxane model compounds, to establish whether exchange occurs at the cage framework at all. If the cage opens, the result sets a clear boundary on how aggressive the catalysis can be in any POSS vitrimer and explains why cage-based dynamic networks have not appeared. The reagents are commercial, the instrumentation is standard, and the experiment occupies an afternoon.

Outlook: Where POSS and Vitrimer Chemistry Meet Next

Taken together, these five studies describe a field in which two mature chemistries have remained almost entirely separate. Vitrimer design has converged on the silicon–oxygen bond as one of its most capable dynamic motifs, and silsesquioxane chemistry provides the most precisely defined Si–O architecture available, a monodisperse cage with eight equivalent vertices and twelve equivalent bridges. The only published point of contact treats the cage as a filler, and even in that role it decouples properties that are otherwise coupled. Whether the cage can also serve as the exchange site is an open structural question with a cheap first experiment and a publishable answer in either direction.

A second pattern runs through these studies. Dynamic Si–O chemistry connects applications that appear unrelated, from the reshaping of glass-fibre composites destined for wind turbine blades to the thermal management of integrated circuits, and in each of them the silsesquioxane cage appears as the least examined variable. That is usually a sign of where the next result is to be found.

Frequently Asked Questions About POSS Vitrimers

What is a POSS vitrimer?

A POSS vitrimer is a covalent adaptable network in which polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane cages are built into a vitrimer matrix. The network rearranges its topology by associative exchange, so the crosslink density never drops, while the T8 cage acts as a rigid, molecularly dispersed, eight-arm junction. In every published example the exchange chemistry itself sits in the matrix rather than on the cage.

Does POSS make a vitrimer stronger or more brittle?

Both strength and ductility improve, which is unusual for a filled network. At 10 wt% loading the tensile strength rises 63.5% and the strain at break 75.8%. The eight glycidyl arms raise the crosslink density while the nanoporous cage absorbs deformation energy. The Young's modulus and the glass transition temperature fall slightly.

How fast is siloxane exchange compared with other vitrimer chemistries?

TBD-catalyzed Si–O–Si exchange relaxes in 5.6 s at 220 °C, which puts it inside the window for industrial compression molding. Direct silyl ether metathesis is roughly three orders of magnitude slower (770 s at 170 °C) but survives to 427 °C. Hydroxyl–ester transesterification in the epoxy–POSS network is the slowest of the three below about 175 °C.

Can the Si–O–Si bridges of the T8 cage act as dynamic bonds?

Nobody has tested it. The cage contains twelve Si–O–Si bridges, structurally the same linkage that exchanges in 5.6 s under TBD catalysis, but the strained cage geometry could equally lead to irreversible ring opening. A silicon-29 NMR experiment on a soluble T8 cage held with TBD and a hydroxyl source would settle the question in an afternoon.

Original Publication
Yang, H.; He, C.; Russell, T. P.; Wang, D. "Epoxy-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) nanocomposite vitrimers with high strength, toughness, and efficient relaxation." Giant, 2020, 4, 100035.
DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2020.100035  |  View at ScienceDirect

References

  1. Yang, H.; He, C.; Russell, T. P.; Wang, D. Epoxy-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) nanocomposite vitrimers with high strength, toughness, and efficient relaxation. Giant 2020, 4, 100035. DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2020.100035
  2. Debsharma, T.; Amfilochiou, V.; Wróblewska, A. A.; De Baere, I.; Van Paepegem, W.; Du Prez, F. E. Fast Dynamic Siloxane Exchange Mechanism for Reshapable Vitrimer Composites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12280–12289. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03518
  3. Tretbar, C. A.; Neal, J. A.; Guan, Z. Direct Silyl Ether Metathesis for Vitrimers with Exceptional Thermal Stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16595–16599. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b08876
  4. Yue, C.; Zhao, L.; Guan, L.; Zhang, X.; Qu, C.; Wang, D.; Weng, L. Vitrimeric silicone composite with high thermal conductivity and high repairing efficiency as thermal interface materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 620, 273–283. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.017
  5. Denissen, W.; Winne, J. M.; Du Prez, F. E. Vitrimers: permanent organic networks with glass-like fluidity. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 30–38. DOI: 10.1039/C5SC02223A
  6. Montarnal, D.; Capelot, M.; Tournilhac, F.; Leibler, L. Silica-Like Malleable Materials from Permanent Organic Networks. Science 2011, 334, 965–968. DOI: 10.1126/science.1212648
  7. Mauro, J. C.; Yue, Y.; Ellison, A. J.; Gupta, P. K.; Allan, D. C. Viscosity of glass-forming liquids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 19780–19784. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911705106
  8. Zheng, P.; McCarthy, T. J. A Surprise from 1954: Siloxane Equilibration Is a Simple, Robust, and Obvious Polymer Self-Healing Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2024–2027. DOI: 10.1021/ja2113257
  9. Hajiali, F.; Tajbakhsh, S.; Marić, M. Thermally reprocessable bio-based polymethacrylate vitrimers and nanocomposites. Polymer 2021, 212, 123126. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123126
  10. Cieplucha, M.; Janeta, M.; Szafert, S. Hybrid inorganic–organic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane-based poly(1-haloacetylene)s: thermal, solid-state polymerization. Materials Chemistry Frontiers 2025, 9, 3034. DOI: 10.1039/d5qm00583c
  11. Abad, M. J.; Barral, L.; Fasce, D. P.; Williams, R. J. J. Epoxy networks containing large mass fractions of a monofunctional polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS). Macromolecules 2003, 36, 3128–3135. DOI: 10.1021/ma021539f
  12. Fuchise, K.; Igarashi, M.; Sato, K.; Shimada, S. Organocatalytic controlled/living ring-opening polymerization of cyclotrisiloxanes initiated by water with strong organic base catalysts. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2879–2891. DOI: 10.1039/c7sc04234e

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Octa(3-aminopropyl)silsesquioxane (OAS-POSS) Synthesis

T10 Decameric Silsesquioxanes: Structure and Isolation